<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a Language Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description>About the Delphi programming language, tools, news and community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:46:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Azarien</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Azarien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Delphi is an IDE, a library and a compiler of Object Pascal. There are Pascal and Object Pascal compilers other than Delphi.
But there are no Delphi compilers other than Borland/Inprise/Borland/CodeGear/Abracadabra or whatever they are called now.
In fact, they would sue you if you start selling your own Pascal compiler and you named it Delphi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi is an IDE, a library and a compiler of Object Pascal. There are Pascal and Object Pascal compilers other than Delphi.<br />
But there are no Delphi compilers other than Borland/Inprise/Borland/CodeGear/Abracadabra or whatever they are called now.<br />
In fact, they would sue you if you start selling your own Pascal compiler and you named it Delphi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RRR</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>RRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Delphi IS Object Pascal. It&#039;s a version of Object Pascal.
Calling Delphi just &quot;Object Pascal&quot; is sort of like calling Viper just &quot;Dodge&quot;. Not fundamentally wrong, but NOT ACCURATE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi IS Object Pascal. It&#8217;s a version of Object Pascal.<br />
Calling Delphi just &#8220;Object Pascal&#8221; is sort of like calling Viper just &#8220;Dodge&#8221;. Not fundamentally wrong, but NOT ACCURATE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McKeeth</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McKeeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-450</guid>
		<description>A lot more votes, but &quot;Delphi&quot; is still in the lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot more votes, but &#8220;Delphi&#8221; is still in the lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wim ten Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Wim ten Brink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-448</guid>
		<description>True, TP5 was just Pascal while TP5.5 and higher introduced the use of objects. However, classes were introduced with Delphi 1 and not before thus I prefer to call TP5.5, TP6, TP7, BP7, TPW1 and TPW1.5 as just Pascal with Objects, while Delphi 1 introduced the real Object Pascal.
And it&#039;s true that Borland deprecated the name &quot;Object Pascal&quot; since D6 but by introducing &quot;Delphi for PHP&quot;, they just continued the name confusion. If they hadn&#039;t created the PHP version, I&#039;d just call the language Delphi too. Although, we do also have to consider the current Open-Source Pascal compilers. These are based upon Delphi but won&#039;t be able to call the language Delphi. (Trademark issues.) Because those open-source compilers, I&#039;m even more compelled to refer to the language as just &quot;Object Pascal&quot;. (But Pascal++ sounds good too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, TP5 was just Pascal while TP5.5 and higher introduced the use of objects. However, classes were introduced with Delphi 1 and not before thus I prefer to call TP5.5, TP6, TP7, BP7, TPW1 and TPW1.5 as just Pascal with Objects, while Delphi 1 introduced the real Object Pascal.<br />
And it&#8217;s true that Borland deprecated the name &#8220;Object Pascal&#8221; since D6 but by introducing &#8220;Delphi for PHP&#8221;, they just continued the name confusion. If they hadn&#8217;t created the PHP version, I&#8217;d just call the language Delphi too. Although, we do also have to consider the current Open-Source Pascal compilers. These are based upon Delphi but won&#8217;t be able to call the language Delphi. (Trademark issues.) Because those open-source compilers, I&#8217;m even more compelled to refer to the language as just &#8220;Object Pascal&#8221;. (But Pascal++ sounds good too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRo</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>PRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-447</guid>
		<description>The Turbo Pascal 5 product was for the Pascal language.  The Turbo Pascal 5.5 product was for the Object Pascal language.  Then came Turbo Pascal 6 and 7.  What would have been Turbo Pascal 8 was called Delphi 1.  It is incorrect to say the compiler became object-oriented at Delphi 1/Turbo Pascal 8 when it actually happened 3 versions earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Turbo Pascal 5 product was for the Pascal language.  The Turbo Pascal 5.5 product was for the Object Pascal language.  Then came Turbo Pascal 6 and 7.  What would have been Turbo Pascal 8 was called Delphi 1.  It is incorrect to say the compiler became object-oriented at Delphi 1/Turbo Pascal 8 when it actually happened 3 versions earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.D.Castel</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>F.D.Castel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-446</guid>
		<description>I would say that half of &quot;Object pascal language&quot; voters were simply unaware that Borland deprecated this form around Delphi 6~7 in favor of &quot;Delphi language&quot;. I stick with &quot;Delphi&quot;. More simple and explicit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that half of &#8220;Object pascal language&#8221; voters were simply unaware that Borland deprecated this form around Delphi 6~7 in favor of &#8220;Delphi language&#8221;. I stick with &#8220;Delphi&#8221;. More simple and explicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanko Milosev</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanko Milosev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Delphi, for me, because of people. If I said I am programming in Pascal, people will not know what to think, Modula 2 is also one of implementation of Pascal, if I said Delphi, I am more precise, and people will understand me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi, for me, because of people. If I said I am programming in Pascal, people will not know what to think, Modula 2 is also one of implementation of Pascal, if I said Delphi, I am more precise, and people will understand me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphi Peak - Delphi Programming » Object Pascal (Delphi) vs Java (C#)</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Delphi Peak - Delphi Programming » Object Pascal (Delphi) vs Java (C#)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-442</guid>
		<description>[...] yazılım geliştirmemizi sağlayan IDE nin adı mı, Object Pascal&#8217;ın bir dialekti mi tartışmaları süre dursun biz biraz Delphi ile Java arasındaki yazım kurallarını irdeleyelim. Hazır Delphi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yazılım geliştirmemizi sağlayan IDE nin adı mı, Object Pascal&#8217;ın bir dialekti mi tartışmaları süre dursun biz biraz Delphi ile Java arasındaki yazım kurallarını irdeleyelim. Hazır Delphi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Fiske</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Fiske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-441</guid>
		<description>The way I remember it, when Delphi 1 came out, the push was to call the language Delphi because Pascal had such a huge stigma attached to it, but it was still called Object Pascal in the documentation. Then when CodeGear came out with Delphi for PHP, the semi-official statement was made that Delphi was the environment and the language was Object Pascal. So it&#039;s never been clear, and the constant renaming hints at being ashamed of one or the other.

I agree with the statements made here that Object Pascal is the overall language and Delphi refers to a dialect. But looking at web sites and blogs and the general usage over the last several years, the term &quot;Object Pascal&quot; is infrequently seen, and most of us would say &quot;I program in Delphi.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I remember it, when Delphi 1 came out, the push was to call the language Delphi because Pascal had such a huge stigma attached to it, but it was still called Object Pascal in the documentation. Then when CodeGear came out with Delphi for PHP, the semi-official statement was made that Delphi was the environment and the language was Object Pascal. So it&#8217;s never been clear, and the constant renaming hints at being ashamed of one or the other.</p>
<p>I agree with the statements made here that Object Pascal is the overall language and Delphi refers to a dialect. But looking at web sites and blogs and the general usage over the last several years, the term &#8220;Object Pascal&#8221; is infrequently seen, and most of us would say &#8220;I program in Delphi.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabricio</title>
		<link>http://www.delphi.org/2009/02/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delphi.org/?p=568#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Delphi is the IDE + Framework(VCL, RTL, etc). The pillar over which it&#039;s built is the Object Pascal language.

If course, IMHO.

@Mike: Codegear extended the above concept changing the pillar from OP to PHP....... Never used it, don&#039;t know how good(or bad?) this IDE for PHP is....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delphi is the IDE + Framework(VCL, RTL, etc). The pillar over which it&#8217;s built is the Object Pascal language.</p>
<p>If course, IMHO.</p>
<p>@Mike: Codegear extended the above concept changing the pillar from OP to PHP&#8230;&#8230;. Never used it, don&#8217;t know how good(or bad?) this IDE for PHP is&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
